Research

Comparative research on constructional safety and safety on building sites

prof. mr. dr. M.A.B. (Monika) Chao-Duivis |mr. dr. E.M. (Evelien) Bruggeman |2019

Over the past years the Netherlands has faced a number of accidents on construction sites. Those accidents concerned both constructional safety of the building itself as well as the safety on and around the construction site. The Dutch were faced not only with collapsing of: balcony’s (Maastricht and Leeuwarden), stairs (Utrecht), rooftops (due to excessive snow fall), a supermarket exterior wall (Drachten), and a parking lot (which was still under construction), but also with numerous threats regarding constructional safety (e.g. the recent evacuation of numerous existing buildings because of suspected problems with concrete wide slab floors). But not only constructional safety is a cause for concern in the Netherlands, safety on construction sites (and the immediate surroundings of the actual construction site) leaves much to be desired as well. There were for example accidents with a collapsing bridge section during placement (Alphen aan den Rijn) and an accident involving falling building materials killing a bystander (The Hague)

The Dutch Safety Research Board (Onderzoeksraad voor de Veiligheid) has conducted research into a several of the accidents mentioned above and has come to the conclusion that a lack of coordination on the construction site and during construction itself, is one of the major causes of our current problems. Altogether the Board identifies four key problems: 1) lack of coordination on the building site (between all parties involved in the design and construction process), 2) opaque distribution of responsibilities between all parties involved 3) insufficient safety awareness, and 4) insufficient risk assessment. The Safety Research Board has come up with a number of recommendations in its respective research reports of the accidents. Two of those, the result of the research into the accident with the collapsing bridge sections in Alpen aan den Rijn are especially interesting (p. 84-85 of the report):

The first recommendation consists of the appointment of a central responsible party or figure for systematic assessment and management of risks involved in the construction process as a whole. The second recommendations consists of the obligation for all parties involved to, under the oversight of the above mentioned central party, cooperate in a way in which the risks involving the construction of a work are contained in the optimal way.

In order to achieve this, both risk allocation and cooperation obligations must be recorded in a coherent and unambiguous way in the general terms governing the legal relationships of the parties involved.

The Institute of Construction Law is of the opinion that lessons can be learned from other European countries regarding safeguarding constructional safety and safety on building sites. As a result, The Institute has initiated a comparative research project. The objective of this research is to compare both the practical and legal systems regarding constructional safety and safety on and in the direct vicinity of construction sites, in six European countries (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom) with the system in the Netherlands. We wish to receive insights and knowledge on the respective legal systems and the rules and regulations concerning constructional safety and safety on building sites.
In order to obtain the necessary, and first and foremost correct, information about the different legal systems we invited six national legal experts on the subject, to contribute to our research:

Belgium – Sara Cockx LL.M.
Denmark – Marlene Louise Buch Andersen
France – dr. Néda Armbruster and Alexandre Le Pallec
Germany – prof. dr. jur. Bastian Fuchs LL.M.
Switzerland – prof. dr. Hubert Stöckli and Pascal Rey
United Kingdom- prof. Anthony P. Lavers and Jessica Twombley LL.M.

The research will dig into both the rules and regulations laid down by law, as well as those established by the use of standard contracts and general terms. The research is primarily looking into private construction law. However, if a national system has a system regarding constructional safety which is based on public law and public authority powers, we will research what the influence of those regulations is on construction contracts. The research will be conducted in the summer and autumn of 2018 and the national experts will join in a (private) expert meeting this fall to exchange knowledge and experience regarding the subject of the research. The results of the research will be published in the spring of 2019.

Meer onderzoeken van prof. mr. dr. M.A.B. Chao-Duivis
•Rechtsvergelijkend Bouwconsumentenrecht
•Onderzoek klachten en geschillen bij bouwen

Did you find this research interesting?

Dan bevelen we de volgende cursussen en bijeenkomsten aan: